Paul Krugman just can't stand the praise being given to Chile's liberal economic reforms of the last 30-40 years, so he is denigrating them. Why would he do that? He claims the economic liberalization in Chile is nearly mythical, and uses the following chart as his key piece of evidence. It's scandalously misleading.
That chart does not jibe with my own experience following Chile's development, especially in contrast to other Latin American economies. And note the source: Total Economy Database. Why not use the Penn World Tables, or World Bank data? Paul's data says Chileans are just 15 percent wealthier than they were in 1970. The PWT Mark 6.3 indicates they are 161 percent wealthier. So who do you trust: the global standard for cross-country economic comparisons or the Nobel prize-winning NYTimes blogger?
Even my kids know the answer. Just look at the wikipedia entry on Chile's economy, and you'll find this chart:
For the record, anyone who travels in Latin America can attest that little Chile's role as a model is not what you might expect. Neighboring nations still like to think of Chile as their poor sibling, and pretend that its economic success does not exist. It's time to take off the rose-colored glasses.
UPDATE: The chart Krugman uses cuts off in 1991, so it's not the data source that's misleading. It's chart trickery with the X axis, a Tufte favorite.

The second chart was Krugman's last point. The first chart shows the Pinochet's period 1973-1989 and this is the period Krugman is talking about. Most of the growth in Chile has happened after the country recovered it's democracy and the government's economic policies started to move to the center left. One telling statistic is that in 1989 about 40% of the population lived under the poverty line, currently this figure is about 13%.
Posted by: Cristian Rojas | March 05, 2010 at 02:19 PM
Of course there also was a precipitous decrease in Chilean GDP from 1970-1973 during a period of democracy...
Some people argue that even without Pinochet, Chile would have still become the most economically free Latin American country today, despite its brief non-majority democratic election of a hard-core Socialist. But we'll never know.
I think we will have to see how Chavez ends up to see whether democracy in Latin America can truly suffer a hard-core socialist. Will he still be in power 10 years from now, or will he be democratically defeated?
Posted by: Mr. Econotarian | March 21, 2010 at 01:32 AM
The battle of ideas is not won or lost in Congress, or even in elections, but in the long assessment of history. Just ask Qeng Ho.
Posted by: louis vuitton | April 08, 2010 at 08:44 PM
Most of the advance in Chile has happened afterwards the country recovered it's capitalism and the government's bread-and-butter behavior started to move to the centermost left.
Posted by: Vimax | June 07, 2010 at 05:29 AM
I will persist until I succeed.I will persist with knowledge that each failure to sell will increase my chance for success at the next attempt. Posed By ugg bailey button
Posted by: ugg bailey button | August 10, 2010 at 07:28 PM
well if we look back in the economy history of Chile, we will notice a common pattern, their economy is not that constant, they have had lows and ups throughout history, so what is happening now it's normal!
Posted by: Generic Viagra | August 30, 2010 at 03:58 PM
Amazing one, i appreciate this work....
Posted by: high school ged | September 02, 2010 at 01:15 AM
anyone who travels in Latin America can attest that little Chile's role as a model is not what you might expect.
Posted by: wall mounted pot rack | September 25, 2010 at 07:55 AM
Similar to Bakugan if a Zooble is rolled over a magnetic strip the Zooble will open up revealing all of the Zooble cuteness that had been hiding inside the Zoobles ball. You can choose yours at http://www.toptoys2trade.com/zoobles-c-60/ They are new in the market but very soon it is expected that they will take over the young generation toy market as more and more parents will prefer this cute little toy for their young children.
Posted by: power balance | November 02, 2010 at 11:03 PM
Ils sont utiles pour moi dans le travail! Je conçois un casino! J'aime mon travail!
Posted by: Casino | November 11, 2010 at 04:21 PM
record, anyone who travels in Latin America can attest that little Chile's role as a model is not what you might expect. Neighboring nations still like to think of Chile as their poor sibling, and pretend that its economic success does not exist. It's time to take off the rose-colored
Posted by: Shox R5 Shoes | November 12, 2010 at 01:11 AM
of the last 30-40 years, so he is denigrating them. Why would he do that? He claims the economic liberalization in Chile is nearly mythical, and uses the following chart as his key piece of evidence. It's scandalously
Posted by: Shox R5 Shoes | November 13, 2010 at 12:08 AM
I went to Chile last year and must admit found it quite oppressive. The economic growth may be real, but I'm not sure it's being distributed on a fair basis to the majority of the population. As we know the most 'happy' societies are those where there is minimal distance between the rich and the poor. I'm all for distribution of wealth.
Posted by: Paternity test | November 13, 2010 at 10:37 AM
Everything is lively and lovely.
Posted by: english taobao | November 15, 2010 at 08:42 PM
Good at planning, good at time management.*
Posted by: coach outlet stores | November 15, 2010 at 08:49 PM
What is his purpose in denigrating Chile and its economic progress? What would he gain by it?
Posted by: Teeth Whitening Kits | November 20, 2010 at 06:27 AM
We know that some governments release fake statistics about their economy to boost their international standing.
Posted by: Anxiety Attack Symptoms | November 27, 2010 at 06:56 AM
Intresting article, I would like to ask you for another post about that
Posted by: buy tadalafil | December 06, 2010 at 07:46 PM
I guess the point is to give and save as much as you can and make your money work for you like the good servant we should strive to be.
Posted by: MBT Shoes Uk | December 24, 2010 at 12:25 AM
Allen at Division is right. British politics and courts are very different. I would have a difficult time in a British courtroom with a judge that looked like this. I would definitely be thrown in the gaol. Notice how I threw the British term for jail in there?
Posted by: TR Brand Jeans | January 13, 2011 at 09:57 AM
I really agree with the facts that you have shared on this post. An interesting topic like this really enhances reader's mind to have more effective decisions over a certain issue.
Posted by: Penis Enlargement Pills | January 13, 2011 at 01:51 PM
I don`t know very much about Chile, but the economic growth may be real, I'm not sure it's being distributed on a fair basis to the majority of the population.
Posted by: how to win the lottery | February 08, 2011 at 09:50 AM
he economic growth may be real, but I'm not sure it's being distributed on a fair basis to the majority of the population. As we know the most 'happy' societies are those where there is minimal distance between the rich and the poor
Posted by: how to win at blackjack | February 10, 2011 at 03:29 AM
Anyone who travels in Latin America can attest that little Chile's role as a model is not what you might expect.
Posted by: acid reflux diet | February 14, 2011 at 06:29 AM
Neighboring nations still like to think of Chile as their poor sibling, and pretend that its economic success does not exist.
Posted by: roulette strategy | February 15, 2011 at 02:45 PM
A mean can be destroyed but not defeated.
Posted by: coach purses | February 16, 2011 at 01:13 AM
For the last 30-40 years, so he is denigrating them. Why would he do that? He claims the economic liberalization in Chile is nearly mythical, and uses the following chart as his key piece of evidence. It's scandalously.
Posted by: sports betting system | February 17, 2011 at 01:24 AM
Some people argue that even without Pinochet, Chile would have still become the most economically free Latin American country today, despite its brief non-majority democratic election of a hard-core Socialist. But we'll never know.
Posted by: local seo | February 18, 2011 at 01:47 AM
mm, the battle of ideas is not won or lost in Congress, or even in elections, but in the long assessment of history. Just ask Qeng Ho.
Posted by: weight loss diet | February 18, 2011 at 01:58 AM
we have to do something for chile guys
Posted by: Thinning Hair Women | February 22, 2011 at 09:17 AM
I dugg some of you post as I cogitated they were handy extremely helpful
Posted by: blue film | February 27, 2011 at 10:17 AM
anyone who travels in Latin America can attest that little Chile's role as a model is not what you might expect.
Posted by: detox diet | March 04, 2011 at 06:16 AM
The battle of ideas is not won or lost in Congress, or even in elections, but in the long assessment of history. Just ask Qeng Ho... :)
Posted by: Anti Aging Diet | March 04, 2011 at 10:37 AM
the most economically free Latin American country today, despite its brief non-majority democratic election of a hard-core Socialist.
Posted by: lacoste polo shirts | March 07, 2011 at 03:04 AM
Hola,
Ha hecho un trabajo muy bueno. Hay muchas personas en busca de eso ahora van a encontrar suficientes fuentes por tus consejos.
espera para obtener más consejos acerca de que
Posted by: Generic Cialis | March 07, 2011 at 11:26 PM
Paul Krugman just can't stand the praise being given to Chile's liberal economic reforms of the last 30-40 years, so he is denigrating them :) interesting
Posted by: how to win the powerball | March 11, 2011 at 04:26 AM
The battle of ideas is not won or lost in Congress, or even in elections, but in the long assessment of history.wELL SAID :)
Posted by: fat loss 4 idiots review | March 13, 2011 at 06:46 AM
So who do you trust: the global standard for cross-country economic comparisons or the Nobel prize-winning NYTimes blogger? good question .. .
Posted by: sports betting professor review | March 15, 2011 at 04:26 PM