« QOTD: "Though some kinds of future, I fear, can only be found in the past." | Main | Jobs Report for 2009: A Depressing Year »

January 07, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e55212008788330120a7b1fc4f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Paul Romer's Errors:

Comments

Michael

Great post Tim. I think the challenge of rule-changing that you mention is one of the most salient factors in determining how well countries and cultures are able to progress.

There are several models and frameworks explaining how institutions change, both in the form of laws and in the form of norms (one of my favorites comes from Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson's article, "Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth"), but as far as how to make rule-changing easier, I don't believe there are any clear-cut answers. One immediate solution would be to foster a culture of change, progress and dynamism, but trying to grow this kind of culture constitutes a rule- or norm-change in and of itself, and is thus not super helpful.

Tim Kane

Thanks Michael. That was a great paper. However, I think the word "institutions" is a bit ambiguous. I've been saying it for years now, and at the AEA realized other people were using it with a completely different definition. Kind of like "technology" ...

Norris Krueger

Interesting- wrestling with "how to grow a more entrepreneurial Idaho?" makes this particularly timely. A couple of questions arise --

1) "Rules" also include the deep assumptions that drive policy making. Judging by what I'm hearing at various conferences, those rules have changed in DC... policy is VERY top-down, institutionalist. (Entrepreneurs don't really create jobs, rather institutions create conditions and entrepreneurs almost randomly surface, but it's the institutions that are critical.) So, do we have a case where one important Rule changed overnight?

2) If you can forgive 2 Q's in one post, can we think about the well-entrenched "Rules' versus the more malleable "rules" that we can more readily affect? Brad Feld suggests that it takes decades and probably outside impact to create a truly entrepreneurial culture in a community. There are just too many Big Rules that change slowly no matter what we do. My response is: Anthropology suggests that there are seemingly important norms that can change overnight (ans seemingly trivial 'rules' that seem implacable.) My question to you: Aren't there rules (small r) that we *can* change? And is this something worth studying? For example, are there rules that changing facilitate changing Rules? (Key leverage points for accelerating a shift to more entrepreneurial community?)

Anyway, love the blog -- always thought-provoking (and often useful!)
Norris

Nathan Smith

I didn't read Romer's paper (is there a link?) but from a modeling point of view, are we doing anything more than reinterpreting the Solow residual and throwing in a bit of narrative? We need to do better than that to solve the problem Tim points out about "institutions" being ambiguous (or at worst, hand-waving).

John B. Chilton

I don't accept your example of passing legislation in U.S. as a good example of the difficulty of changing rules. That's an example of a desired stability of rules built into the constitution, and reinforced by the American public that seems to favor gridlock as a way, however imperfect, of limiting the size of government.

Compare that to unstable countries where the constitution and laws are subject to wide swings, disrupt property rights, result in takings, etc.

Mr. Econotarian

Law can rarely escape the culture it is embedded in. The US has been lucky in attracting so many different immigrants who were alienated over a single generation from their home cultures which were less accepting of the inviolability of private property. The US has also made "independence" and "freedom" into a state religion of sorts, whereas other cultures respect filial piety, or redistribution of wealth to the extended family, clan, or entire village.

The US has also been lucky that our English land-owner culture that enabled our high level of economic freedom has turned out to also be highly economically rewarding.

However, it is time we tell the world that economic freedom is not just a culture, or a kind of religion, but it has shown itself scientifically to be a useful societal ordering for creating mass wealth.

We certainly can't force people to give up their culture. We can only lead by example, and try to inform people of the facts.

louis vuitton online shop

Tim: As I wrote on my blog, Truth on the Market, I think Tyler is pretty far off base with this one. See http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/28/what-does-tyler-know-about-law-and-economics-anyway/

mts

I didn't read Romer's paper (is there a link?) but from a modeling point of view, are we doing anything more than reinterpreting the Solow residual and throwing in a bit of narrative? We need to do better than that to solve the problem Tim points out about "institutions" being ambiguous (or at worst, hand-waving).

George Detellis

I have worked in Haiti for the past 27 years and in the Dominican Republic for the past 10. These two countries share the same island, but are worlds apart economically. A simple comparison of their "rules" - property rights, labor laws, tax structure explains why Haiti is poor and the Dominican Republic is relatively wealthy.

replica watches

It is pretty certain that the Replica handbags you are looking for is a must-have handbag. Of course, who doesn't and not especially if it's one of the

High School Diploma

I agree with post analysis

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment