Guest post by Charles Johnson
The ire over Whole Foods CEO, John Mackey's WSJ op-ed on health
care has entered a new phase, with union boycotters calling for him to be
removed as CEO and chairman by the Whole Foods board. I quote,
"Mr. Mackey attempted to capitalize on the brand reputation of Whole Foods to champion his personal political views, but has instead deeply offended a key segment of Whole Foods consumer base," CtW Investment Group's Executive Director Bill Patterson said in a statement.
Meanwhile, the
United Food and Commercial Workers Union, which is part of Change to Win, said
it will be giving out information to Whole Foods shoppers about health care
reform. The group said Mackey's op-ed was an "attempt to undermine Obama's
health-care reform."
First of all, the boycott is clearly failing. Whole Foods's stock
hasn't fallen a bit since the boycott began. If anything, it's increased! (Which, incidentally, is welcome news to this Whole Foods admittedly extremely small scale stock owner.)
Second of all, why don't we want entrepreneurs injecting their politics into the national debate? If it is acceptable for entrepreneurs to inject their politics into the debate in favor of increasing marginal tax rate, increasing the gax tax, and removing subsidies on fossil fuels? Why isn’t it okay for one entrepreneur, who by all accounts has helped his employees get some of the best coverage available, to weigh in on the health care debate?
We should be thanking Mr. Mackey for bringing his expertise to bear on a problem of national import, particularly given his experience insuring his own work force!
(For those interested in greater detail, be sure to check out Megan McArdle's excellent post explaining why the Whole Foods boycott is really a non-starter.)

Who is Charles Johnson? Is he still a Professor of Economics at MIT? I may have the wrong guy? Very interesting observation.
Peace George Munchus,UAB
Professor Of Mangement
Posted by: George Munchus | August 25, 2009 at 07:03 PM
The comments seem to be talking all around the question but not addressing the heart of the entreprenurial debate. The issue should be: How to get state capital around the financial logjam and into the hands of the entrepreneur.
Posted by: louis vuitton | April 08, 2010 at 09:21 PM
Is he still a Professor of Economics at MIT? I may have the wrong guy? Very interesting observation.
Posted by: ClubPenguinCheats | June 20, 2010 at 11:35 PM
It is pretty certain that the Replica handbags you are looking for is a must-have handbag. Of course, who doesn't and not especially if it's one of the
Posted by: replica watches | July 15, 2010 at 06:18 AM
i don't think he is still professor
Posted by: Pakistani Recipes | September 25, 2010 at 02:20 AM
thts not good for comapany
Posted by: Cricket Streaming | September 25, 2010 at 02:23 AM
conflict between employee and employer will damage company
Posted by: Counter Strike Hacks | September 25, 2010 at 02:30 AM
It's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, thanx now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: Cheap Jersey | October 15, 2010 at 01:25 AM
conflict between employee and employer will damage company
Posted by: sports hats | October 16, 2010 at 04:51 AM
First of all, the boycott is clearly failing. Whole Foods's stock hasn't fallen a bit since the boycott began. If anything, it's increased! (Which, incidentally, is welcome news to this Whole Foods admittedly extremely small scale stock owner.)
Posted by: sofa bed sheets | October 22, 2010 at 01:29 PM
First of all, the boycott is clearly failing. Whole Foods's stock hasn't fallen a bit since the boycott began. If anything, it's increased! (Which, incidentally, is welcome news to this Whole Foods admittedly extremely small scale stock owner.)
Posted by: solid oak bedroom furniture | October 25, 2010 at 06:30 PM
It's good to see this information in your post, thank you keep going on
Posted by: nike running shoes | October 30, 2010 at 08:57 AM
Your blog write very wonderful, very good, can be posted to my page?
Posted by: christian louboutin shoes | November 01, 2010 at 08:55 PM
Bless your friend forever! Also bless myself!*
Posted by: coach factory outlet | November 04, 2010 at 02:27 AM
i agree sports-hat
Posted by: Funny Pictures | November 26, 2010 at 06:13 AM
I guess the point is to give and save as much as you can and make your money work for you like the good servant we should strive to be.
Posted by: MBT Shoes Uk | December 23, 2010 at 11:35 PM
Thanks for your comments, Stephen! Yeah, I've considered all these things,
and did try to talk to him about it. But he shied away from telling me any
good reasons soooo..... I'll really never know! But it's entertaining now
(not back then!) to ruminate on reasons why. Thanks for your added thoughts!
;)
Posted by: discount coach handbags | December 31, 2010 at 02:52 AM
Love,love love this post!O(∩_∩)O~
Posted by: Jordan Big Fund | January 13, 2011 at 01:55 AM
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about information and love learning more on this. If possible, as you gain expertise, It is extremely helpful for me. would you mind updating your blog with more information
Posted by: Penis Enlargement | January 13, 2011 at 03:20 PM
i agree
Posted by: scan free | February 11, 2011 at 03:08 AM
i think he is better
Posted by: Free Antivirus | February 11, 2011 at 03:09 AM
lol cant get whats goin on here
Posted by: Download Counter Strike | February 12, 2011 at 12:32 AM
I enjoyed reading it. I need to read more on this topic...I admiring time and effort you put in your blog, because it is obviously one great place where I can find lot of useful info.
Posted by: escapada rural | February 17, 2011 at 07:42 AM
Charles Johnson showed one more time that he is a great guest blogger. Nice post!!!
Posted by: tillers for sale | March 04, 2011 at 02:46 PM