Arthur Benjamin of Harvey Mudd College, a very selective science and math school in Claremont, CA, gave a short three minute talk at TED about why statistics ought to be taught over calculus in America's mathematics curriculum. (Full disclosure: The Kauffman Foundation helps to fund TEDTalks.)
Several popular books in recent years have stressed the point that Professor Benjamin makes. Nassim Taleb's Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets and Ian Ayres's Supercrunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart being the more outstanding and readable examples of this larger trends.
Firms, too, have taken note. Jonathan Rosenberg, Google's Senior VP of Product Management, in a YouTube talk at his alma mater, says that students should aspire to be "data samurais."
Given this importance, there ought to be some kind of Hippocratic oath for statistians. While failing to do calculus properly can result in a poorly built bridge, failing to do statistics correctly can lead to horrible policies that create perverse and oftentimes completely opposite incentives.
Professor Benjamin is right: It would do wonders for our education system if people understood what a standard deviation is and how to find a mean.

I simply do not get it. Why do we have to choose only one?
Posted by: Michael F. Martin | July 07, 2009 at 09:01 PM
We don't. It's just that for most math curricula calculus is the be all and end all. It's clearly not as useful to everyday folks as statistics.
Posted by: Charles C. Johnson | July 08, 2009 at 12:54 PM
I've got a big bias, but my feeling is that we need to teach stats to the students who aren't studying any calculus.
Posted by: Dan Weber | July 09, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Absolutely! Statistics is more practical and valuable in the real world.
Posted by: Sipag at Tiyaga | July 12, 2009 at 01:47 PM
How much can you understand about statistics without learning calculus?
I guess I don't get what we're talking about. Are we saying that kids should learn how to compute averages and standard deviations? I thought they already taught that in algebra.
What does "teaching statistics" mean? How can you understand even basic concepts from statistics without calculus?
And why is calculus still considered so hard three-hundred years after it was invented. There is simply nothing mysterious or difficult about calculus. I think we need to get over this whole attitude of mysticism about mathematics.
Posted by: Michael F. Martin | July 15, 2009 at 05:53 PM
Tim: As I wrote on my blog, Truth on the Market, I think Tyler is pretty far off base with this one. See http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/28/what-does-tyler-know-about-law-and-economics-anyway/
Posted by: louis vuitton online shop | April 08, 2010 at 08:58 PM
yes, i agree!
Posted by: juicy couture | May 06, 2010 at 08:33 AM
It is pretty certain that the Replica handbags you are looking for is a must-have handbag. Of course, who doesn't and not especially if it's one of the
Posted by: replica watches | July 15, 2010 at 06:33 AM
Your posting is very good and theme base for which it is liking to every people. Thanks a lot!!!
Posted by: affordable degree programs | September 14, 2010 at 01:00 AM
it’s good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource.
Posted by: life experience degree | September 17, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Nice article to share. Worth information given. Love you work
Posted by: mah jong game | September 21, 2010 at 12:09 PM
No matter where you are, you let fly into your house, make good landing in your side and happiness always accompany with you, let your room, let the flowing with years of writing poems with unforgettable, let my message for you happiness and good luck!
Posted by: new balance | September 24, 2010 at 08:14 PM
Blessed be God, the Father of Christ Jesus our Lord, who in Christ has blessed us from heaven with every spiritual blessing.
Posted by: Air Jordan Shoes | November 04, 2010 at 12:45 AM
lf into the Castle of Amber, from which he finds a safe spot and rests.
Posted by: chanel bags | November 11, 2010 at 01:56 AM
I love you post!
Posted by: Air Jordan | November 11, 2010 at 08:13 PM
yes you are right!
Posted by: Air Jordans | November 12, 2010 at 01:48 AM
just go around, but surprised by your blogs, the information is so interesting,I deeply attract by it.
Posted by: ugg sale | November 16, 2010 at 02:50 AM
Cool,
Nice,
I would have never guessed that chereogrphers would need anything,
Thanks for writing about it
Posted by: coach handbags | December 16, 2010 at 01:17 AM
I guess the point is to give and save as much as you can and make your money work for you like the good servant we should strive to be.
Posted by: MBT Shoes Uk | December 23, 2010 at 11:37 PM
faulty logic-- swooning over a character in a movie doesn't equal hitting on someone. men of all ages have been drooling over the likes of britney spears (when she first came out), taylor swift, and even dakota fanning now for ages. megan fox is something like 23 and i know for a fact that 40 year old men make no secret of wanting to bang her stupid.
as for cradle-robbing relationships, most girls i know date older guys, whereas dudes tend to date younger. way younger. case in point: a 32 year old male friend dating a 20 year old girl. for that matter, that same friend and i had sexy times and he's six years older than i am.
Posted by: coach outlet | December 28, 2010 at 01:19 AM
These kind of post are always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post
Posted by: Penis Enlargement | January 13, 2011 at 06:26 PM
*Forget about stupidity, discover your ability.
Posted by: Taobao buy | January 17, 2011 at 09:34 PM
The new rule would also change how big processors operate
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Handbags | February 10, 2011 at 02:43 AM