Arthur Benjamin of Harvey Mudd College, a very selective science and math school in Claremont, CA, gave a short three minute talk at TED about why statistics ought to be taught over calculus in America's mathematics curriculum. (Full disclosure: The Kauffman Foundation helps to fund TEDTalks.)
Several popular books in recent years have stressed the point that Professor Benjamin makes. Nassim Taleb's Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets and Ian Ayres's Supercrunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart being the more outstanding and readable examples of this larger trends.
Firms, too, have taken note. Jonathan Rosenberg, Google's Senior VP of Product Management, in a YouTube talk at his alma mater, says that students should aspire to be "data samurais."
Given this importance, there ought to be some kind of Hippocratic oath for statistians. While failing to do calculus properly can result in a poorly built bridge, failing to do statistics correctly can lead to horrible policies that create perverse and oftentimes completely opposite incentives.
Professor Benjamin is right: It would do wonders for our education system if people understood what a standard deviation is and how to find a mean.
I simply do not get it. Why do we have to choose only one?
Posted by: Michael F. Martin | July 07, 2009 at 09:01 PM
We don't. It's just that for most math curricula calculus is the be all and end all. It's clearly not as useful to everyday folks as statistics.
Posted by: Charles C. Johnson | July 08, 2009 at 12:54 PM
I've got a big bias, but my feeling is that we need to teach stats to the students who aren't studying any calculus.
Posted by: Dan Weber | July 09, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Absolutely! Statistics is more practical and valuable in the real world.
Posted by: Sipag at Tiyaga | July 12, 2009 at 01:47 PM
How much can you understand about statistics without learning calculus?
I guess I don't get what we're talking about. Are we saying that kids should learn how to compute averages and standard deviations? I thought they already taught that in algebra.
What does "teaching statistics" mean? How can you understand even basic concepts from statistics without calculus?
And why is calculus still considered so hard three-hundred years after it was invented. There is simply nothing mysterious or difficult about calculus. I think we need to get over this whole attitude of mysticism about mathematics.
Posted by: Michael F. Martin | July 15, 2009 at 05:53 PM
Tim: As I wrote on my blog, Truth on the Market, I think Tyler is pretty far off base with this one. See http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/28/what-does-tyler-know-about-law-and-economics-anyway/
Posted by: louis vuitton online shop | April 08, 2010 at 08:58 PM
yes, i agree!
Posted by: juicy couture | May 06, 2010 at 08:33 AM
It is pretty certain that the Replica handbags you are looking for is a must-have handbag. Of course, who doesn't and not especially if it's one of the
Posted by: replica watches | July 15, 2010 at 06:33 AM