One illusion about healthcare reform is that the only problem we have to tackle is the uninsured. The larger problem is that those of us with insurance have too much coverage, so that neither patients nor doctors have to pay attention to costs when making decisions. That is going to have to change.
Workers who are concerned about the availability of health insurance may suffer from “job lock.” They might wish to leave their job for self-employment, pursuit of formal education, an opportunity with a smaller firm, or early retirement, but the potential loss of health insurance is a deterrent.
I haven't had the chance to talk with Bob about this, or Carl Schramm -- point being that both know more about health care policy than my doctor and I combined -- but I am torn about the upcoming battle over healthcare reform. Whatever the bill pays for, I am likely to distrust its impact on market incentives, but how it pays may turn me into a full-throated Obamaite (Obamacon? What are they called?). The WaPo has a great article today about Dem infighting over the revenue plan for healthcare. Growthology mantra for the summer: Taxing employer-provided health insurance is not just a way to pay for reform, it is health care reform. Every entrepreneur knows this is the key to levelling the playing field. Let's hope it happens.

Great points. It will be interesting to see what comes about.
Posted by: Vance | June 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Forgive me for being a conspiracy theory nut because I am not one, but I have an idea about how health care might be paid for but I confess it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
The Obama administration is insistent on prevention, instead of treatment. That's the right focus, but it might mean sin taxes on everything from soft drinks, to fatty burgers, to everything in between. Proponents could argue that these taxes are Pigovian. Given that these demand curves are no doubt highly inelastic (people are addicted), it might just hurt people who pay for it without actually accomplishing Pigovian solutions.
This seems to be the direction the debate is going on. Witness the public support for the FDA becoming a regulator of cigarettes. Can this soda tax to pay for health care really be that far off? http://american.com/archive/2009/june/a-fat-tax-that2019s-hard-to-swallow
Posted by: Charles C. Johnson | June 16, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Plastic Surgeon Operated Medical Spa Helps Promote Optimal Health and Beauty - Indulge Yourself...
Posted by: Park Ridge Medical Spa | November 29, 2009 at 09:44 AM
I am torn about the upcoming battle over healthcare reform. Whatever the bill pays for, I am likely to distrust its impact on market incentives, but how it pays may turn me into a full-throated Obamaite
Posted by: Stop smoking | January 03, 2010 at 08:03 PM
the epidemic of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries, where the disease is now the leading cause of cancer-related death among adult women. American Cancer Society
Posted by: Stop smoking | January 03, 2010 at 08:08 PM
Has there been any updates on this?? What happened?
Posted by: miami limo | January 05, 2010 at 06:42 AM
In 2009, the overhaul of the health care system in the United States was approved and the Senate passed an $871 billion bill. This was a major step towards health care reform and the stage was now set.
Greetings
Posted by: buy cialis | March 02, 2010 at 09:22 AM
As baby boomers retire, higher federal spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid may boost Millennials' taxes and squeeze other government programs. It will be harder to start and raise families.
Posted by: generic viagra online | March 17, 2010 at 04:08 PM
According to government classifications of Industry, which are mostly based on the United Nations system, the International Standard Industrial Classification, health care generally consists of hospital activities, medical and dental practice activities, and other human health activities. The last class consists of all activities for human health not performed by hospitals or by medical doctors or dentists.
Posted by: tumor cells | March 24, 2010 at 03:16 PM
The battle of ideas is not won or lost in Congress, or even in elections, but in the long assessment of history. Just ask Qeng Ho.
Posted by: louis vuitton | April 08, 2010 at 08:50 PM
The battle of ideas is not won or lost in Congress, or even in elections, but in the long assessment of history. Just ask Qeng Ho
Posted by: replica watches | July 15, 2010 at 05:35 PM
it’s good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource.
Posted by: degree at home | September 30, 2010 at 03:10 AM
I am following your blog regularly and got great information. I really like the tips you have given. Thanks a lot for sharing. Will be referring a lot of friends about this.
Posted by: tampa web design | October 13, 2010 at 08:39 AM